Cover -- Title page -- Copyright information -- Preface -- CONTENTS -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1 The ILO and Forced Labour -- 1.2 How the ILO Works -- 1.3 Aims of Casebook -- 1.4 Reading this Casebook: An Overview of Common Themes -- 2. International Instruments -- 2.1 The ILO Forced Labour Conventions and ILO Views -- 2.1.1 Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29) -- 2.1.2 Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957 (No. 105) -- 2.1.3 Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182) -- 2.1.4 The ILO Committee of Experts on the Meaning of Forced Labour -- 2.2 The UN Slavery Conventions -- 2.2.1 Slavery Convention, 1926 -- 2.2.2 Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade,and Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery, 1956 -- 2.3 International Criminal Instruments -- 2.3.1 The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons,Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United NationsConvention against Transnational Organized Crime, 2000 -- 2.3.2 The Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the FormerYugoslavia, 1993 -- 2.3.3 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1998 -- 3. Forced labour in international courts -- 3.1 The International Court for the FormerYugoslavia: Defining and Refining the Conceptof Enslavement -- 3.1.1 Defining Enslavement:Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Case No. IT-96-23 (22 February 2001) andCase No. IT-96-23-A (12 June 2002) (Appeals Chamber)41 -- 3.1.2 Climate of Fear:Prosecutor v. Krnojelac, Case No. IT-97-25 (15 March 2002) andCase No. IT-97-25-A (17 September 2003) (Appeals Chamber) -- 3.1.3 A Closer Look at the Concept of Climate of Fear -- 4. Forced labour in regional courts -- 4.1 The European Court of Human Rights:Imposing Positive Obligations on States forIndividual Violations of Criminal Law.

4.1.1 Offer to Work Not Involuntary:Van der Mussele v. Belgium, Application No. 8919/90 (23 November 1983) -- 4.1.2 Extreme Vulnerability Amounting to Menace of a Penalty:Siliadin v. France, Application No. 73316/01 (26 July 2005) -- 4.2 Economic Community of West African States(ECOWAS) Community Court of Justice:Recognizing Positive Obligations of States toProtect Individuals from Slavery -- 4.2.1 Holding States Accountable:Hadijatou Mani v. Republic of Niger, Community Court of Justice(27 October 2008) -- 5. Forced labour in South Asia -- 5.1 India -- 5.1.1 Payment Below the Minimum Wage:People's Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India, A.I.R. 1982S.C. 1473 (19 September 1982) -- 5.1.2 Creating a Rebuttable Presumption of Forced Labour:Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India, A.I.R. 1984, S.C. 820 -- 5.1.3 Another Look at Peonage and Bonded Labour -- 5.2 Pakistan -- 5.2.1 Court Decision Leading to Enactment of Legislation:Darshan Masih v. State, P.L.D. 1990 S.C. 513 -- 5.2.2 Requiring Physical Restraint for Forced Labour:Judgment of High Court of Sindh, Circuit Court, Hyderabad (2002) -- 6. Forced labour in Europe -- 6.1 Belgium -- 6.1.1 Finding Working Conditions Contrary to Human Dignity:Public Ministry v. Wang Li Kang, Wang Qi et al., Court of Appeal of Liège,Decision No. 2007/245 (24 January 2007) -- 6.2 France -- 6.2.1 Risk of Unemployment as Abuse of Economic Dependence:Procureur de la République v. Monsieur B., Decision No. 97/8641,Court of Appeal of Poitiers (26 February 2001) -- 6.3 Netherlands -- 6.3.1 Abuse of Vulnerability but Not Exploitation:The Public Prosecution Service v. The Accused, No. 07.976405-06, District Court of Zwolle (29 April 2008) -- 7. Forced labour in the Americas -- 7.1 Brazil.

7.1.1 Using a Company Store to Create 'Chains':Public Ministry of Labour v. Lazaro Jose Veloso (Fazenda Sao Luiz),Judgment No. 218/2002, 30 April 2003 -- 7.1.2 First Prison Sentence for Forced Labour:Federal Public Ministry v. Gilberto Andrade, JudgmentN°2000.37.00.002913-2, Penal Court of Maranhão State, 23 April 2008 -- 7.2 The United States -- 7.2.1 Forced Labour as a Norm of International Customary Law:Individual Liability for Violations of International Law -- 7.2.2 Forced Labour as a Violation of Customary International Law:Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co., 67 F. Supp 2d 424 (D.N.J. 1999) -- 7.2.3 Debts Not Owed to Employer mean no Forced Labour:Doe I v. The Gap, 2001 WL 1842389 (D.N. Mar. I. 2001) -- 7.2.4. Intersection of Trafficking and Forced Labour:Jane Doe v. Reddy, 2003 WL 23893010 (N.D.Cal. 2003) -- 7.2.5 Individual Non-State Actor Liability for International Crime:Doe I v. Unocal Corporation, 395 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2003) -- 7.2.6 Myanmar and the Status of the Forced Labour as a Norm ofInternational Law -- 7.2.7 Court Finds No Forced Labour for Adult Plaintiffs:Roe v. Bridgestone, 492 F. Supp. 2d 988 (S.D. Ind. 2007) -- 7.2.8 When Does Overtime Become Forced Labour? -- 7.2.9 Involuntary Servitude and Forced Labour Under Domestic Law -- 7.2.10 Psychological Coercion Alone not Involuntary Servitude:United States v. Kozminski, 487 US 931 (1988) -- 7.2.11 Defining Forced Labour in Terms of Individual Vulnerabilities:United States v. Bradley, 390 F.3d 145 (1st Cir. 2004) -- List of Acronyms -- Back cover.