Cover image for The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution.
The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution.
Title:
The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution.
Author:
Gutzman, Kevin.
ISBN:
9781596986183
Personal Author:
Physical Description:
1 online resource (262 pages)
Series:
Politically Incorrect Guides
Contents:
Title Page -- Dedication -- Introduction -- Chapter One - WHAT MADE THE CONSTITUTION: REVOLUTION AND CONFEDERATION -- The trouble begins ... -- "If this be treason, make the most of it" -- Jefferson stakes out America's rights -- Jefferson's view of the British Empire: A federation of independent states -- Gunsmoke-and fear of domestic tyranny -- A state is a state is a ... country -- Chapter Two - FEDERALISM VS. NATIONALISM AT THE PHILADELPHIA CONVENTION -- A constitution for the "United States" -- Reforming the Confederation -- A vision of national government: The Virginia Plan -- Monarchists and nationalists and federalists-oh my! -- Chapter Three - SELLING THE CONSTITUTION -- A rocky road -- Federalists battle Republicans over the Bill of Rights -- It all comes down to Virginia -- But what about The Federalist? -- The question of sovereignty: Never really explained -- Who ratified the Constitution: "The American people" or the sovereign states? -- Chapter Four - JUDGES: POWER-HUNGRY FROM THE BEGINNING -- Judging the judges -- The Court's first steps -- The Eleventh Amendment: Protecting the states from the Supreme Court -- Finally, a Bill of Rights! -- The Washington factor -- The trouble with France -- Washington crusades for a whiskey tax -- Jay's Treaty sparks controversy -- Breaking the law is . . . against the law -- The Federalists' secret weapon: Judges -- Jefferson and Madison argue for states' rights -- Chapter Five - THE IMPERIAL JUDICIARY: IT STARTED WITH MARSHALL -- High crimes and misdemeanors abound -- Impeaching Justice Chase -- The Supreme Court's march through Georgia (and Virginia) -- Madison's banking flip-flops -- "The wolf by the ear" -- The Dartmouth review -- The "great Lama of the mountains" vs. Marshall -- Marshall finds the elastic in the Commerce Clause -- Marshall nullifies the Declaration of Independence.

State sovereignty? Never heard of it -- Marshall finally gets one right -- Chapter Six - UNDOING MARSHALL-AND UNDOING THE UNION -- "The object and end of all government" -- Taney tackles the Commerce and Contracts Clauses -- The War for Southern Independence -- All men are (not really) born free and equal -- Dred Scott v. Sandford -- Chapter Seven - THE WAR FOR SOUTHERN INDEPENDENCE AS A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS -- The Emancipation Proclamation -- The "reconstruction" of the Constitution -- Chapter Eight - THE PRO-SEGREGATION SUPREME COURT -- "Instrumentalities of the state"? Sounds like socialism to me -- Segregation is in the eye of the beholder -- Supreme logic: A corporation is like a freed slave -- It depends on your definition of "is" -- The income tax was unconstitutional -- Chapter Nine - THE COURT VS. FDR -- Uncle Sam wants YOU! -- Can you put that protest on hold until after the war? -- The political platform of the Supreme Court: Pro-war, pro-child labor -- The Supreme Court vs. the Roosevelt Democrats -- Chapter Ten - THE GRAND WIZARD'S IMPERIAL COURT -- "Updating" the framers -- How the Constitution got "incorporated" rather than interpreted -- How the Ku Klux Klan separated church from state -- The Supreme Court vs. Christianity -- Chapter Eleven - THE COURT ON PORNOGRAPHY, CRIME, AND RACE -- The "inarticulate roars" of the Court -- Freedom of pornography -- The Supremes and criminal law -- Cruel and unusual punishment -- Brown v. Board of Education and its offspring -- The civil rights legislation of the 1960s -- Chapter Twelve - THE COURT'S BRAVE NEW WORLD: FROM AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO SODOMY -- Affirmative action -- Sex discrimination and the Fourteenth Amendment -- The Supreme Court and "privacy" -- The Supreme Court's electoral interventions -- CONCLUSION -- THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION -- THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES -- Acknowledgements -- NOTES -- INDEX -- Copyright Page.
Abstract:
The Constitution of the United States created a representative republic marked by federalism and the separation of powers. Yet numerous federal judges--led by the Supreme Court--have used the Constitution as a blank check to substitute their own views on hot-button issues such as abortion, capital punishment, and samesex marriage for perfectly constitutional laws enacted by We the People through our elected representatives. Now, The Politically Incorrect Guide(tm) to the Constitution shows that there is very little relationship between the Constitution as ratified by the thirteen original states more than two centuries ago and the "constitutional law" imposed upon us since then. Instead of the system of state-level decision makers and elected officials the Constitution was intended to create, judges have given us a highly centralized system in which bureaucrats and appointed--not elected--officials make most of the important policies. In The Politically Incorrect Guide(tm) to the Constitution, Professor Kevin Gutzman, who holds advanced degrees in both law and American history: * explains how the Constitution was understood by the founders who wrote it and the people who ratified it * follows the Supreme Court as it uses the fig leaf of the Constitution to cover its naked usurpation of the rights and powers the Constitution explicitly reserves to the states and to the people * shows how we slid from the Constitution's republican federal government, with its very limited powers, to an unrepublican "judgeocracy" with limitless powers * reveals how huge swaths of American law and society were remade in the wake of Supreme Court rulings * reveals how the Fourteenth Amendment has been twisted to use the Bill of Rights as a check on state power instead of on federal power, as originally intended * exposes the radical inconsistency between

"constitutional law" and the rule of law * contends that the judges who receive the most attention in history books are celebrated for acting against the Constitution rather than for it As Professor Gutzman shows, constitutional law is supposed to apply the Constitution's plain meaning to prevent judges, presidents, and congresses from overstepping their authority. If we want to return to the founding fathers' vision of the Republic, if we want the Constitution enforced in the way it was explained to the people at the time of its ratification, then we have to overcome the "received wisdom" about what constitutional law is. The Politically Incorrect Guide(tm) to the Constitution is an important step in that direction.
Local Note:
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2017. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
Electronic Access:
Click to View
Holds: Copies: