
Lis Pendens in International Litigation.
Title:
Lis Pendens in International Litigation.
Author:
McLachlan, Campbell.
ISBN:
9789047441441
Personal Author:
Edition:
1st ed.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (492 pages)
Series:
The Pocket Books of the Hague Academy of International Law//Les livres de poche de l'Académie de droit international de La Haye ; v.5
The Pocket Books of the Hague Academy of International Law//Les livres de poche de l'Académie de droit international de La Haye
Contents:
Copyright -- HAGUE ACADEMY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW -- Lis Pendens in International Litigation -- TABLE OF CONTENTS -- CHAPTER I* INTRODUCTION -- A. Of the Conflict of Litigation -- B. The litispendence phenomenon -- 1. Forum shopping in parallel litigation -- 2. Horizontality -- 3. Overlapping jurisdiction-conferring rules -- 4. Kompetenz-Kompetenz : who determines jurisdiction ? -- C. Intellectual origins of the idea of lis pendens -- 1. Civil Law: in the image of Roman Law? -- 2. Common Law: the legacy of Equity's struggle for supremacy in England -- D. Legal techniques for the control of competingjurisdictions -- 1. Tolerance of parallel proceedings and res judicata -- 2. Rules of priority -- 3. Consolidation of related proceedings -- 4. Party autonomy, election and waiver -- 5. Discretions to decline jurisdiction or control parallel litigation -- E. The Rule of Law and the Function of Adjudication in International Cases -- Chapter II. Private international litigation -- A. Deference, indifference or control ? -- 1. A world of two hemispheres ? -- 2. Two contrasting approaches in Civil Law systems -- 3. Two contrasting approaches in a Common Law system -- B. Strict lis pendens : pursuing the res judicataparallel -- 1. Translation of an internal into an international rule -- 2. The search for identity of action -- (a) Same parties -- (b) Same subject-matter and same cause -- 3. Assessment of effects -- (a) The negative declaration -- (b) The reflexive effect of a convention -- C. Jurisdiction-declining discretions -- 1. Litispendence within the forum non conveniens enquiry -- (a) Double litigation by the same plaintiff -- (b) A forum contest between plaintiff and defendant -- 2. Declining jurisdiction in favour of related proceedings -- D. The rise and fall of the anti-suit injunction.
1. Commonwealth use of anti-suit injunctions to control foreign parallel litigation -- 2. A division of principle in the United States -- 3. Contraction of the anti-suit injunction in the face of comity concerns -- (a) Conflict of laws cedes where no true litispendence -- (b) Requirement of jurisdictional nexus -- (c) European law constraints -- E. Interim conclusions -- Chapter III. International arbitration -- A. The place of parallel proceedings in international arbitration -- 1. The use of party autonomy as an escape from multiple fora -- 2. Instances of overlapping jurisdiction. -- B. International commercial arbitration -- 1. Kompetenz-Kompetenz or who decides on arbitral jurisdiction -- (a) The arbitral tribunal or the courts -- (b) The courts of the seat and other courts -- 2. Parallel and related arbitral proceedings -- 3. The anti-suit injunction in arbitration -- (a) Issue of anti-suit injunctions by arbitrators -- (b) The Front Comor and anti-suit injunctions in aid of arbitration -- (c) Anti-arbitration injunctions -- C. Investment treaty arbitration -- 1. The particular potential for conflicts of jurisdictionin investment treaty arbitration -- 2. The distinction between breach of contract and breach of treaty -- (a) National law and international lawremedies distinguished -- (b) Effect of contractual jurisdiction clause -- 3. Election and waiver -- (a) The fork in the road -- (b) Waiver -- 4. The impact of an umbrella clause -- 5. Parallel treaty arbitration -- D. Interim conclusions -- Chapter IV. Public international litigation -- A. The judicialization of Public International Law. -- 1. The rise of public international adjudication -- 2. Rationales for the proliferation of internationaltribunals -- 3. Polycentric nature of modern disputes -- (a) Concurrent individual and State respon sibilityfor international crimes.
(b) Concurrent regional and international trade law proceedings -- B. Relationships between international tribunals -- 1. Express provision -- (a) Human rights -- (b) The Law of the Sea -- 2. Is lis pendens a general principle of law appli cable to international tribunals ? -- C. Relationship between national and international litigation -- 1. Rules of separation of international from national proceedings -- 2. Effect of pending international proceedings before national courts -- (a) The Consular Convention cases - ICJ and US Supreme Court -- (b) The Caribbean cases : the Privy Council and the Inter-American Human Rights system -- D. Interim conclusions -- Chapter V. Conclusion -- A. The exercise of adjudicatory authority in a plural world -- 1. The fact of decisional fragmentation -- 2. A constitutional or administrative law model? -- 3. General principles in the resolution of the conflict of litigation -- B. The search for new solutions -- 1. From a Westphalian to a cosmopolitan paradigm -- 2. Declining and referring jurisdiction - newmodel lis pendens -- 3. Judicial co-operation and communication -- C. Final conclusions -- Select Bibliography -- About the author -- Biographical note -- Principal publications.
Abstract:
What legal principles apply when courts in different jurisdictions are simultaneously seised with the same dispute ? This question - of international lis pendens - has long been controversial. But it has taken on new and urgent importance in our age. Globalization has driven an unprecedented rise in forum shopping between national courts and a proliferation of new international tribunals. Problems of litispendence have spawned some of the most dramatic litigation of modern times - from anti-suit injunction battles in commercial disputes, to the appeals of prisoners on death row to international human rights tribunals. The way we respond to this challenge has profound theoretical implications for the interaction of legal systems in today's pluralistic world. In this wide-ranging survey, McLachlan analyses the problems of parallel litigation - in private and public international law and international arbitration. He argues that we need to develop a more sophisticated set of rules of conflict of litigation, guided by a cosmopolitan conception of the rule of law.
Local Note:
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2017. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
Genre:
Electronic Access:
Click to View