
Weak Referentiality.
Title:
Weak Referentiality.
Author:
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana.
ISBN:
9789027269386
Personal Author:
Physical Description:
1 online resource (402 pages)
Series:
Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today ; v.219
Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today
Contents:
Weak Referentiality -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC data -- Table of content -- List of contributors -- List of abbreviations -- Advances in weak referentiality -- 1. Weak referentiality -- 2. Weak referential properties -- 3. The papers in this volume -- 3.1 Indefinites -- 3.2 Incorporation -- 3.3 Predication -- 3.4 Number -- 3.5 (Weak) definites -- 4. Conclusion -- References -- Modal inferences in marked indefinites -- 1. Corpus study -- 1.1 Haspelmath's implicational map -- 1.2 The corpus -- 1.3 Results -- 1.4 Discussion -- 2. On the meaning of irgend-indefinites -- 3. Conclusion -- References -- Epistemic and scopal properties of some indefinites -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Some indefinites and (non-)specificity -- 3. Study 1: Long-distance scope -- 3.1 Methodology -- 3.1.1 Experimental contexts and corresponding predictions -- 3.1.2 Test lists -- 3.1.3 Participants and procedure -- 3.2 Results -- 3.3 Discussion -- 4. Study 2: Epistemic and scopal (non-)specificity -- 4.1 Methodology -- 4.1.1 Experimental contexts and corresponding predictions -- 4.2 Test lists -- 4.2.1 Participants and procedure -- 4.3 Results -- 4.3.1 Results on epistemic (non-)specificity -- 4.4 Results on scopal (non-)specificity -- 4.5 Discussion -- 5. General discussion -- 6. Conclusion and directions for further research -- References -- Antonymic prepositions and weak referentiality -- 0. Introduction -- 1. Weak referentiality -- 2. A logistic regression analysis of mit and ohne -- 2.1 The sense inventory -- 2.2 Logistic regression modelling and annotation mining -- 2.3 Random effects in the model -- 3. Weak referentiality and the distribution of determiner omission -- 3.1 Distribution of determiner omission over different senses -- 3.2 Negative contexts -- 4. Adjectives and omission -- 5. Conclusion -- References.
Weak referentiality and Russian instrumental nominals -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The data and the framework -- 2.1 Romance bare predicates -- 2.2 Russian instrumental case -- 2.3 Syntactic structure for bare predicates -- 3. Additional weak and weak referential nominals in instr case -- 3.1 Nominal adjuncts -- 3.2 Cognate adjuncts -- 3.3 Manner cognate objects -- 3.3.1 Manner COs with unergative verbs -- 3.3.2 Two types of manner COs with unaccusative verbs -- 3.3.3 Manner COs with adnominal genitives -- 4. Concluding remarks -- References -- Predicate nominals in Papiamentu -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Predicate nominals -- 3. Bare count nouns -- 3.1 Bare singulars -- 3.2 Bare plurals -- 4. The structure of bare nominals -- 4.1 Bare singulars and bare plurals interpreted as kinds -- 4.2 Bare plurals in Papiamentu: Examining nan more closely -- 5. Analyzing predicate nominals -- 6. Summary and remaining problems -- References -- Many a plural -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The plural in English -- 3. The classifying plural in Arabic -- 4. The plural in singulative systems -- 5. The plural distributed -- 6. Conclusion -- Acknowledgments -- References -- Telic definites and their prepositions -- 1. Telic definites in French -- 1.1 Weak definites as functional definites -- 1.2 Telic vs locative definites -- 2. Telic definites in Serbian -- 2.1 Expressing (in)definiteness in Serbian -- 2.2 Telic constructions in Serbian -- 2.3 Prepositions used in telic constructions in Serbian -- 2.4 The bare nouns of Serbian telic readings are functional definite NPs -- 2.5 Telic readings and the selection of the preposition: na and u -- 3. Conclusion -- References -- How weak and how definite are Weak Definites? -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The properties of weak definites -- 3. Co-varying interpretations of definites -- 4. Reference to kinds of events.
4.1 Bare singulars, incorporation, and established activities -- 4.2 The semantics of kind terms -- 4.3 Verb phrases as expressing kinds of events -- 4.4 Further properties of weak definites in light of the present analysis -- 4.5 Loose ends -- 4.5.1 Open issues -- 4.5.2 Comparison to Aguilar-Guevara and Zwarts (2011) -- 5. Conclusion -- References -- Modified weak definites -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Weak definites and reference to kinds -- 2.1 Sloppy readings -- 2.2 Lexical restrictions -- 2.3 Restrictions on modification -- 3. Kind-level adjectives -- 3.1 Relational adjectives -- 3.2 A semantics for RAs -- 4. Testing modification and sloppy readings -- 4.1 Experiment 1. Testing I-adjectives -- 4.1.1 Materials -- 4.1.2 Method -- 4.1.3 Predictions -- 4.1.4 Analysis and item selection -- 4.2 Experiment 2. Testing kind-level adjectives -- 4.2.1 Materials -- 4.2.2 Method -- 4.2.3 Predictions -- 4.3 Results -- 4.4 Discussion -- 5. Conclusions -- Acknowledgments -- References -- Functional frames in the interpretation of weak nominals -- 1. Weak definites -- 2. Weak nominals as referring to kinds -- 3. Weak nominals as referring to functions -- 4. Weak nominals as referring to roles in frames -- 5. Weak nominals: Final remarks -- References -- Unscrambling the lexical nature of weak definiteness -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Definiteness and direct object scrambling in Dutch -- 3. Behavioral evidence for Dutch scrambling -- 4. Operationalizing lexical connectedness -- 4.1 Semantic integration -- Description -- Data collection -- Results -- 4.2 Object cloze probability -- Description -- Data collection -- Results -- 4.3 Verb cloze probability -- Description -- Data collection -- Results -- 4.4 Object-verb pair cloze probability -- Description -- Data collection -- Results -- 4.5 Item groups -- 5. Lexical connectedness and weak definiteness -- 6. Discussion.
7. Conclusion -- Acknowledgments -- References -- Appendix A -- Inalienable possession -- 1. Introduction -- 2. French facts -- 2.1 Three constructions -- 2.2 Syntactic constraints -- 2.3 Lexical constraints -- 3. Previous analyses -- 3.1 Guéron (1983, 1985) -- 3.2 Vergnaud and Zubizarreta (1992) -- 3.3 Discussion -- 4. Our proposal -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 The uniqueness challenge -- 4.2.1 The lexical semantics of nouns like hand -- 4.2.2 Combining nouns like hand with determiners -- Combining determiners with the basic non-relational semantics of hand -- Combining determiners with the standard relational semantics of hand -- Combining determiners with the implicitly relational version of hand -- Combining determiners with the abstract relational interpretation of hand -- 4.2.3 Summary -- 4.3 The variation challenge -- 5. Conclusion -- References -- Basque nominals -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Nominals and the definite determiner in Standard Basque -- 3. Nominals in Souletin -- 3.1 The use of the definite determiner in Souletin -- 3.2 Existential interpretation: D-less nominals in Souletin (are DPs) -- 3.3 Evidence that Souletin BNs are syntactically DPs -- 4. The denotation of BNs in Souletin (and Standard Basque) -- 4.1 Numerals/Weak Quantifiers + BNs -- 4.2 Predicative uses of BNs -- 4.3 Compounding -- 4.4 BNs in Basque vs. BNs in East Asian languages -- 5. From Souletin to Standard Basque -- 5.1 Motivation 1: Loss of null D -- 5.2 Motivation 2: Number morphology -- 5.3 On why the Basque definite article is on D, and not below -- 6. Conclusions -- References -- Referential properties of definites and salience spreading -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Reference and electrophysiology -- 2.1 Definite vs. indefinite expressions -- 2.2 Inherently definite expressions -- 2.3 Ontological features -- 2.4 Enriched composition -- 3. Salience spreading.
3.1 ERP study -- 3.1.1 Methods -- 3.1.2 Results of the ERP Data -- 3.2 Discussion -- 4. Implications for investigations of weak definites -- Acknowledgements -- References -- Index.
Abstract:
We provide a survey of different aspects of definiteness by means of comprehension data collected via event-related brain potential recordings. We present a processing account including differences between definites and indefinites, as well as the contribution of lexical feature specifications, uniqueness, degrees of accessibility and enrichment. We then present new data associated with salience spreading from referential expressions to their supersets. Two core mechanisms emerge in all these studies that reflect the computation of accessibility information on the one hand and updating of discourse structure on the other hand. With the availability of these two processes, the nature and processing consequences of weak definites may be narrowed down and validated in future research.
Local Note:
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2017. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
Genre:
Electronic Access:
Click to View