Cover -- Table of Contents -- Introduction ([Vito Breda] [Lidia Rodak]) -- PART I Philosophical Perspectives -- 1. What rationality? Whose objectivity? (Michal Pazdziora) -- 2. Objectivity and arbitrariness of blind rule-following or what it means to follow a (legal) rule blindly (Lucia Berdisova) -- 3. The causality of omissions and the objectivity of human agency (Pietro Denaro) -- PART II Analytical Perspectives -- 4. Objectivity and Institutional Reflexivity in Law (Maciej Pichlak) -- 5. "Essentialism of a kind" and "objectivity of a kind" as necessary for law (Lidia Rodak) -- 6. The objectivity of the legal text in view of the concept of semantic autonomy. Comments on Paul Ricoeur's theory (Marcin Pieniążek) -- 7. The imperative of objectivity and neutrality in legal science and its repercussion on judicial activity: an analysis of the ideas of the Latin-American jurist Luis Alberto Warat (Jaqueline Sena) -- PART III Historical Perspectives -- 8. The Purloined Letter: Law, History and the Theory of Totalitarianism (Cosmin Cercel) -- 9. Postmodern Evolution of Places of Justice: The Use and Abuse of Transparency (David Marrani) -- PART IV Empirical Perspectives -- 10. The Concept of Objectivity in the UK Supreme Court through a Comparative Looking Glass (Vito Breda) -- 11. Paternalism and 'Objective' Best Interests (Antal Szerletics) -- Bibliography.