Cover image for Main Clause Phenomena : New Horizons.
Main Clause Phenomena : New Horizons.
Title:
Main Clause Phenomena : New Horizons.
Author:
Aelbrecht, Lobke.
ISBN:
9789027273659
Personal Author:
Physical Description:
1 online resource (439 pages)
Series:
Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today ; v.190

Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today
Contents:
Main Clause Phenomena -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC data -- Table of contents -- INTRODUCTION -- Main clause phenomena and the privilege of the root -- 1. Main clause phenomena: The familiar view -- 1.1 A first inventory of MCP -- 1.2 A semantic restriction on MCP -- 1.3 A broader view of MCP? -- 2. Back to the roots: Emonds (1976) -- 2.1 A syntactic classification of transformations -- 2.2 COMP substitution rules -- 2.3 Deletions as MCP -- 3. Towards a typology of MCP -- 3.1 MCP vs. root phenomena -- 3.2 V2 and the typology of MCP -- 3.3 An alternative typology of MCP -- 3.4 MCP: The unusual suspects -- 5. Outline of this volume -- References -- PART I. Explaining Main Clause Phenomena: The bigger picture -- Augmented structure preservation and the Tensed S Constraint -- 1. Root phenomena and Discourse Shells -- 2. Root-like structures of Indirect Discourse -- 3. Predictions of Chomsky's Tensed S Constraint -- 4. Simplifying/generalizing the Structure Preserving Constraint -- 4.1 Phrasal Movements under Augmented Structure Preservation -- 4.2 Head Movements under Augmented Structure Preservation -- 4.2.1 Head movements limited to root clauses -- 4.2.2 Head movements not limited to roots: substitutions -- 4.2.3 Head adjunctions -- 5. Left dislocation constructions -- 5.1 Left Dislocation and Discourse Shells -- 5.2 Predicting the order Topics - Focus -- 5.3 The comma intonation in Left Dislocation -- 6. Rightward movements of phrases -- 6.1 Structure-preserving instances of Move -- 6.2 Free word order phenomena disguised as movement -- 6.3 Exempting genuine subcases of Merge from Move -- References -- Root transformations & quantificational structure -- 1. Adverbial quantification -- 2. When/Before/After-clauses, presupposition & RTs -- 2.1 Asserted When/Before/After-clauses? -- 2.2 A more refined semantics (Johnston 1994).

2.2.1 The adjunct restriction reading -- 2.2.2 The head restriction reading -- 2.2.3 Implications -- 2.3 The syntax-semantics mapping revisited -- 2.3.1 Adverbial Qs as indefinite pronouns/pronominal Qs -- 3. Because-clauses, presupposition & RTs -- 3.1 The semantics of because-clauses -- 3.1.1 Because as propositional relation -- 3.1.2 Because as event relation -- 3.2 Because-clauses and Q adverbs -- 3.3 Quantifications as states -- 4. Root transformations and semantic structure -- 4.1 Syntactic accounts -- 4.1.1 Clause "Size" -- 4.1.2 Syntactic intervention -- 4.2 Semantic closure -- 5. Conclusion -- References -- Agreements that occur mainly in the main clause -- 1. Root vs. Non-root -- 2. Allocutive agreement in Basque -- 3. Politeness marking in Japanese as a form of allocutive agreement -- 3.1 Strong uniformity -- 4. Politeness marking and the main clause phenomenon -- 4.1 Politeness marking in subordinate clauses -- 4.2 Comparison to Japanese: Allocutive agreement and complementizer type -- 4.3 Reason clause -- 5. Topic wa -- 6. Adverbial clauses and indirect questions -- 6.1 Temporal clause -- 6.2 Indirect question -- 7. SA structure and the MCP in Japanese and English -- 8. Some problems -- 9. Conclusion -- References -- The syntax of MCP -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Main clause phenomena and truncation -- 2.1 The core data -- 2.2 The truncation analysis -- 3. Discussion -- 4. The syntax of initial constituents -- 5. The double asymmetry -- 5.1 The core pattern -- 5.2 Intervention and the double asymmetry -- 5.3 The movement derivation of adverbial clauses -- 5.4 A precursor -- 6. Truncation follows from locality -- 7. Completing the picture: peripheral adverbial clauses -- 8. Summary -- References -- Towards an interface definition of root phenomena -- 1. Root phenomena -- 1.1 A first definition.

2. Three problems for a strictly syntactic approach -- 2.1 Gradience -- 2.2 Variable behaviour of adverbial clauses -- 2.3 Root-like fragments -- 2.4 Summary -- 3. Solution 1: Gradience as mismatch -- 3.1 The interpretive import of root phenomena -- 3.2 The interpretive properties of root-like clauses -- 3.2.1 Epistemic properties -- 3.2.2 Performative properties -- 3.3 Accounting for gradience -- 3.3.1 Prediction 1 -- 3.3.2 Prediction 2 -- 3.3.3 Prediction 3 -- 3.3.4 Prediction 4 -- 4. Solution 2: Capturing variations in 'rootness' -- 4.1 The effect of event quantification -- 4.2 Levels of rootness -- 5. Solution 3: Disentangling pragmatic Force from syntactic Force -- 5.1 Accounting for (Japanese) fragments -- 5.2 The need for an interface account -- 6. Concluding remarks -- References -- Explaining matrix/subordinate domain discrepancies -- 1. Introduction -- 2. 1970's explanations through UG -- 3. Explanations through acquisition -- 4. Apparent counterexamples -- 5. Problems -- 6. Arguments for Degree-0 acquisition -- 7. Discrepancies -- 8. Conclusion -- References -- Parenthetical main clauses - or not? -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Some preliminary remarks -- 3. Appositive constructions -- 3.1 The Janus-faced behavior of appositive relative clauses -- 3.2 On parenthesis -- 3.3 Appositives as embedded parentheticals -- 4. Quasi-relatives -- 5. Conclusion and outlook -- References -- PART II. The Phenomena -- A. PARTICLES AND AGREEMENT MARKERS -- Topic particle stranding and the structure of CP -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Topic particle stranding -- 3. TPS as a root phenomenon -- 3.1 Adverbial clauses -- 3.2 Complement clauses -- 3.3 More on similarities between TPS and sentence-final particles -- 4. Pragmatic functions of TPS and sentence-final particles -- 4.1 Interpersonal communicative functions.

4.2 Syntactic encoding of speaker-addressee interactions -- 4.3 An alternative analysis -- 4.4 Politeness marking in Japanese -- 5. Linking between stranded particle and topic -- 5.1 Null pronoun in Spec-TopP -- 5.2 Consequences of the proposed analysis -- 6. Concluding remarks -- References -- Splitting up force -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1 Syntactic and pragmatic properties of discourse particles -- 2. Italian and Romanian data -- 2.1 Italian discourse particles -- 2.2 Romanian discourse particles -- 3. Discourse particles as main clause phenomena -- 4. The syntactic representation of illocutionary force and clause type as two distinct projections -- 5. A feature-based proposal for the interaction between illocutionary force, clause type, and discourse particles -- 6. Conclusions -- Acknowledgments -- References -- The syntactic position of Polish by and Main Clause Phenomena -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1 Conditionals as free relatives -- 1.2 Operator movement and intervention effects -- 1.3 Types of conditional adverbials -- 1.4 Counterfactual conditionals (CFCs) -- 2. Conditionals in Polish -- 3. Polish conditionals and Main Clause Phenomena -- 3.1 MCP: Contrastive to-topicalization -- 3.2 MCP: Long extraction of adjuncts -- 3.3 MCP: Speaker-oriented adverbs -- 3.4 Movement of by in CFCs -- 3.5 Operator movement and correlativization -- 4. Conclusion -- References -- B. complementizers and verb-second -- A main clause complementizer -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Theoretical and empirical background -- 3. ForceP goes with the flow -- 4. Mono-clausal main clauses -- 5. A hierarchy for E-modals -- 6. E-modals and clause typing -- 6.1 Word order in main clauses -- 6.2 Word order in embedded clauses -- 7. Conclusions -- References -- The status of complementizers in the left periphery -- 1. Introduction: data and analyses.

2. Complement clauses: Headed or free relatives? -- 3. Potential problems -- 4. The interaction with (non-)finiteness -- 5 Conclusions: Main Clause Phenomena -- References -- Minimality and embedded V2 in Scandinavian -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Distribution of embedded V2 in Scandinavian -- 2.1 Declarative complements -- 2.2 Other types of subordinate clauses -- 3. The proposal -- 3.1 Wh- islands -- 3.2 Weak islands (factive and non-assertive clauses) -- 3.3 Negative islands and declarative complements of modified predicates -- 3.4 Predictions -- 4. The trigger of V-to-Fin -- 5. Conclusion -- References -- Against a uniform treatment of second position effects as force markers -- 1. Properties of V2 -- 1.1 V2 as a force marker -- 1.2 Challenges to the treatment of V2 as a uniform force marker -- 1.3 Diachronic arguments against the treatment of V2 as a uniform force marker -- 2. Second position cliticization in Slavic -- 2.1 Properties of second position clitics -- 2.2 Diachrony of second position cliticization in Slavic -- 2.3 Properties of force clitics in Slavic -- 2.3.1 Position in the structure -- 2.3.2 Categorial status of the host -- 2.3.3 Syntactic nature of the host -- 3. Conclusion -- References -- C. ADVERBIAL CLAUSES -- The syntax-discourse interface in adverbial clauses -- 1. Introduction -- 2. A new paradigm of adverbial clauses -- 2.1 The availability of functional heads -- 2.2 Group B (negation type): Zuni ('without') -- 2.3 Group C (conditional type): (Kere)ba 'if' -- 2.4 Type D (polarity type): Toki-(ni) 'when' -- 2.5 Group E (reason type): Node 'because' -- 2.6 Group F (concessive type): Ga 'although' -- 3. Explaining Noda's paradigm -- 3.1 Haegeman (2011/this volume) -- 3.2 Coniglio and Zegrean (2010/this volume) -- 4. Concluding remarks -- References.

Subjunctive mood, epistemic modality and main clause phenomena in the analysis of adverbial clauses.
Abstract:
Peripheral adverbial clauses show many differences from central adverbial clauses, one being that they allow certain root-phenomena, whereas central adverbial clauses do not allow any. A third class of adverbial clauses has to be distinguished, which in German contains continuative w-relatives and free dass-clauses. These allow more root-phenomena than the peripherals and show other signs of greater independence. The paper argues that central and peripheral adverbial clauses are differently licensed syntactically, the former by the host's verbal projection, the latter by Force in the host's periphery. Moreover, adverbials of the third class are not syntactically licensed at all; they are orphans, being only semantically linked to their associated clause by a specific discourse relation.
Local Note:
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2017. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
Electronic Access:
Click to View
Holds: Copies: