Cover -- Contents -- Abbreviations -- Acknowledgements -- Foreword -- Executive Summary -- Management Response -- Chair's Summary: Development Effectiveness Committee -- 1 Introduction -- 2 ADB's Managing for Development Results Agenda -- 3 Relevance -- 4 Responsiveness -- 5 Results Orientation -- 6 Overall Assessment -- 7 Findings, Lessons, Issues, and Recommendations -- Appendixes -- 1 Evaluation Framework and Rating Methodology -- 2 Overview of Managing for Development Results Agenda -- 3 Previous Evaluation Findings -- 4 Stocktaking of Managing for Development Results in ADB -- 5 Comparator Assessment on Managing for Development Results in Multilateral Development Banks -- 6 Stakeholders' Perception -- 7 Progress on Action Plan on Managing for Development Results, 2009-2011 -- 8 Corporate-Layer Indicators for Possible Inclusion in the Corporate Results Framework -- 9 Achievement of Country and Sector-Layer Managing for Development results -- 10 Achievement of Project-Layer Results -- Tables -- 1 Coverage at Each of the Managing for Development Results Layers -- 2 Donors' Requests vis-à-vis Managing for Development Results at ADB -- 3 Alignment of ADB's MfDR Processess for Each MfDR Principle -- 4 Assessment and Rating of Relevance -- 5 Summary of Achievement of 2009-2011 Managing for Development Results Action Plan -- 6 Staff Perceptions of Mainstreaming of Managing for Development Results Agenda -- 7 Staff Perceptions of Sufficiency of Resources to Mainstream the Managing for Development Results Agenda -- 8 Staff Perceptions on Managing for Development Results Skills and Training -- 9 Staff Perceptions on Adequacy of Business Processes Support for Managing for Development Results -- 10 Assessment and Rating of Responsiveness -- 11 ADB Staff Response to Statements Related to Project Learning and Knowledge.

12 Assessment and Rating in Achieving Results Orientation -- 13 Overall Performance Assessment -- Figures -- 1 Main MfDR Processes and Documents by MfDR Layer -- 2 Managing for Development Results Reporting-Current Practice -- 3 Organizational Responsibilities on Managing for Development Results -- 4 Percentage of Project Design and Monitoring Frameworks Rated Satisfactory or Better -- 5 Relative Quality of Project Design and Monitoring Framework Criteria for 2009 and 2010 -- Boxes -- 1 Results at the Center of the Poverty Reduction Strategy in 2004 -- 2 Nepal's Country Strategy: A Pilot Project Showing the Relevance of the Managing for Development Results Approach at the Country Layer.