Cover image for Is Religious Education Possible? : A Philosophical Investigation.
Is Religious Education Possible? : A Philosophical Investigation.
Title:
Is Religious Education Possible? : A Philosophical Investigation.
Author:
Hand, Michael.
ISBN:
9781847143891
Personal Author:
Edition:
1st ed.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (169 pages)
Series:
Continuum Studies in Research in Education
Contents:
Contents -- Foreword -- 1 A Philosophical Problem -- Introduction -- The philosophical debate -- Paul Hirst -- Roger Marples -- David Attfield -- Peter Gardner -- A related debate -- Conclusion -- 2 Understanding a Form of Knowledge -- Introduction -- The forms of knowledge thesis -- Hirst's presentation of the thesis -- Criticisms of Hirst -- Knowledge, propositions and truth -- A restatement of the thesis -- Understanding a form of knowledge -- Conclusion -- 3 Is there a Religious Form of Knowledge? -- Introduction -- Six accounts of religious belief -- Wittgenstein -- D.Z. Phillips -- W.D. Hudson -- John Wisdom -- Allen Brent -- Michael Leahy and Ronald Laura -- Conclusion -- 4 The Meaning of Religious Propositions -- Introduction -- The concept of religion -- Metaphorical applications of the term 'religion' -- Two criteria of religion -- Two anxieties about the concept of religion -- The meaning of religious propositions -- The concept of god -- A note on the term 'God' -- The logic of disputes about gods -- Conclusion -- 5 Mental and Material Propositions -- Introduction -- Mental and material propositions -- The autonomy of mental propositions -- Descartes' argument -- The behaviourist case -- Knowledge without observation -- The problem of other minds -- Conclusion -- 6 Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- O -- P -- R -- S -- T -- V -- W -- Z.
Abstract:
Is Religious Education Possible?: A Philosophical Investigation tackles a well-established problem in the philosophy of education. The problem is the threat posed to the logical possibility of non-confessional religious education by the claim that religion constitutes an autonomous language-game or form of knowledge. Defenders of this claim argue that religion cannot be understood from the outside: it is impossible to impart religious understanding unless one is also prepared to impart religious belief. Michael Hand argues for two central points: first, that non-confessional religious education would indeed be impossible if it were true that religion constitutes a distinct form of knowledge; and, second, that religion does not in fact constitute a distinct form of knowledge.
Local Note:
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2017. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
Electronic Access:
Click to View
Holds: Copies: