Cover image for Phonetics and Phonology of Tense and Lax Obstruents in German.
Phonetics and Phonology of Tense and Lax Obstruents in German.
Title:
Phonetics and Phonology of Tense and Lax Obstruents in German.
Author:
Jessen, Michael.
ISBN:
9789027282248
Personal Author:
Physical Description:
1 online resource (414 pages)
Series:
Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics
Contents:
CONTENTS -- Acknowledgments -- Preface -- CHAPTER 1. Introduction -- 1.1 Tense versus lax obstruents in German -- 1.2 The different functions of the speech sound -- 1.3 Distinctive features -- 1.4 Markedness -- 1.5 Functionalism and formalism -- 1.6 Phonetics and phonology -- CHAPTER 2. Voicing and Aspiration in the Literature -- 2.1 Introduction to the pronouncing dictionaries -- 2.2 Voicing and aspiration in the pronouncing dictionaries -- 2.2.1 WdA -- 2.2.2 Duden -- 2.2.3 Siebs -- 2.2.4 Summary -- 2.3 Transcription-based evidence -- 2.4 Evidence from acoustic phonetics -- 2.4.1 Aspiration duration -- 2.4.1.1 Aspiration in intervocalic position -- 2.4.1.2 Aspiration in utterance-initial position -- 2.4.1.3 Aspiration in post-voiceless position -- 2.4.2 Voicing -- 2.4.2.1 Voicing in intervocalic position -- 2.4.2.2 Voicing in utterance-initial position -- 2.4.2.3 Voicing in post-voiceless position -- 2.4.3 Comments on word-initial intervocalic context -- 2.4.4 Closure duration and vowel duration -- 2.4.5 Fricatives -- 2.4.6 Summary of the acoustic evidence in the literature -- CHAPTER 3. Acoustics: Temporal Parameters -- 3.1 Linguistic stimuli and contexts -- 3.2 Recording and processing -- 3.3 Subjects -- 3.4 Token exclusion -- 3.5 Measurement criteria -- 3.6 Measurement application -- 3.7 Statistical analysis -- 3.8 Results -- 3.9 Discussion -- 3.9.1 Evaluation of the results of Experiment 1 -- 3.9.2 Comparison with the literature -- CHAPTER 4. Acoustics: Perturbation Effects -- 4.1 Experiment 2: F0 perturbation -- 4.1.1 Introduction -- 4.1.2 Material -- 4.1.3 Measurements -- 4.1.4 Results -- 4.1.5 Discussion -- 4.1 Experiment 3: H1-H2 -- 4.2.1 Introduction -- 4.2.2 Material -- 4.2.3 Measurements -- 4.2.4 Results -- 4.2.5 Discussion -- CHAPTER 5. Distinctive Feature Analysis of Tense/Lax Stops.

5.1 Crosslinguistic aspects of the feature [tense] -- 5.2 Korean as a challenge for the feature [tense] -- 5.3 Other feature proposals -- 5.3.1 Nonlinear phonology -- 5.3.2 Kohler (1984) -- 5.3.3 Further proposals and summary -- 5.4 Distinctive feature analysis of German stops -- 5.4.1 Experimental results -- 5.4.2 Comparing [tense] and [spread] -- 5.4.3 Feature proposals in the literature -- 5.5 Further evidence for [tense] in German -- 5.5.1 Fricatives -- 5.5.2 Vowels -- 5.5.3 Word stress -- 5.5.4 The sound/h/ -- 5.5.5 Dialectology and historical linguistics -- 5.6 The adequacy of the term 'Final Devoicing' -- 5.6.1 The basic facts of 'Final Devoicing' -- 5.6.2 Discussing the term 'Final Devoicing' -- 5.7 Conclusion -- CHAPTER 6. Fricatives and Stop/Fricative Differences -- 6.1 Evaluation of the experimental data -- 6.2 Feature syncretism between voicing and tenseness -- 6.3 The markedness of stops and fricatives -- 6.3.1 German phonotactics -- 6.3.1.1 The Puzzle Constraint -- 6.3.1.2 The Initial-/s/ Constraint -- 6.3.2 Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals -- 6.3.2.1 Child language -- 6.3.2.2 Aphasia -- 6.3.2.3 Phonological universals -- 6.4 Crosslinguistic implications and conclusion -- CHAPTER 7. Articulation: Evidence from Transillumination -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 The transillumination method -- 7.3 Results from the literature -- 7.4 The subject: objectivity and reliability -- 7.5 Recording procedure -- 7.6 Data processing -- 7.7 Linguistic stimuli -- 7.8 Measurement events and criteria -- 7.9 Measurement application -- 7.10 Results -- 7.10.1 Introductory remarks -- 7.10.2 Statistical procedures and results -- 7.11 Discussion of results -- 7.11.1 Glottal opening in lax obstruents: active or passive? -- 7.11.2 Size vs. timing of glottal opening as a tense/lax correlate -- 7.11.3 Comparison with the results for other languages.

7.12 General discussion: implications for distinctive feature theory -- CHAPTER 8. Perspectives -- 8.1 Conclusions -- 8.1.1 The phonology-phonetics connection -- 8.1.2 Features from a formal and a functional perspective -- 8.1.3 The distinctive features [voice] and [tense] and their correlates -- 8.1.3.1 Correlate types of [tense] -- 8.1.3.2 Inspiration from Kingston & Diehl on [voice] -- 8.1.3.3 Correlate sharing of [tense] and [voice] -- 8.1.3.4 Remaining issues -- 8.2 Future research -- 8.2.1 Speech perception -- 8.2.1.1 Stop perception -- 8.2.1.2 Fricative perception -- 8.2.1.3 Summary and research suggestions -- 8.2.2 Weakening and the rules vs. representations issue -- 8.3 Final discussion -- 8.3.1 Selective summary -- 8.3.2 The controversy -- Appendix -- A1 Full statistical report: tense versus lax obstruents -- A.2 Place of articulation and other variables -- Notes -- References -- Subject Index -- Name Index.
Abstract:
Knowing that the so-called voiced and voiceless stops in languages like English and German do not always literally differ in voicing, several linguists - among them Roman Jakobson - have proposed that dichotomies such as fortis/lenis or tense/lax might be more suitable to capture the invariant phonetic core of this distinction. Later it became the dominant view that voice onset time or laryngeal features are more reasonable alternatives. However, based on a number of facts and arguments from current phonetics and phonology this book claims that the Jakobsonian feature tense was rejected prematurely. Among the theoretical aspects addressed, it is argued that an acoustic definition of distinctive features best captures the functional aspects of speech communication, while it is also discussed how the conclusions are relevant for formal accounts, such as feature geometry. The invariant of tense is proposed to be durational, and its 'basic correlate' is proposed to be aspiration duration. It is shown that tense and voice differ in their invariant properties and basic correlates, but that they share a number of other correlates, including F0 onset and closure duration. In their stop systems languages constitute a typology between the selection of voice and tense, but in their fricative systems languages universally tend towards a syncretism involving voicing and tenseness together. Though the proposals made here are intended to have general validity, the emphasis is on German. As part of this focus, an acoustic study and a transillumination study of the realization of /p,t,k,f,s/ vs. /b,d,g,v,z/ in German are presented.
Local Note:
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2017. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
Electronic Access:
Click to View
Holds: Copies: