Francisci de Marchia Q1-12 : Quaestiones in secundum librum sententiarum (Reportatio), Quaestiones 1-12. için kapak resmi
Francisci de Marchia Q1-12 : Quaestiones in secundum librum sententiarum (Reportatio), Quaestiones 1-12.
Başlık:
Francisci de Marchia Q1-12 : Quaestiones in secundum librum sententiarum (Reportatio), Quaestiones 1-12.
Yazar:
Suarez-Nani, T.
ISBN:
9789461660299
Yazar Ek Girişi:
Fiziksel Tanımlama:
1 online resource (364 pages)
Seri:
Ancient and Medieval Philosophy - Series 3 Francisci de Marchia Opera Philosophica et Theologica ; v.1

Ancient and Medieval Philosophy - Series 3 Francisci de Marchia Opera Philosophica et Theologica
İçerik:
FRANCISCUS DE MARCHIA -- CONTENTS -- GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO THE SERIES -- EDITORS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS -- INTRODUCTION By Tiziana Suarez-Nani and William Duba -- I. Francis of Marchia's Life -- II. Francis of Marchia's Works -- 1. Quaestiones in IV libros Sententiarum -- 2. Quodlibet -- 3. In libros Physicorum -- 4. Quaestiones in Metaphysicam (books I-VII) -- 5. Quaestiones super primum et secundum librum Metaphysicorum -- 6. Improbatio contra libellum Domini Iohannis qui incipit "Quia vir reprobus" -- 7. Quaestio utrum nativitas Christi fuerit naturalis -- 8. Sermons -- III. The Commentaries on the Four Books of the Sentences -- 1. Composition, dating and manuscript tradition -- A. Principia -- B . Book I -- C. Book II -- D. Book III -- E. Book IV -- 2. The content of the Commentary on the Sentences -- A. Book I -- B. Book II -- C. Book III -- D. Book IV -- IV. The Questions on the Second Book of the Sentences -- 1. Redactions -- A. Reportatio IIA and Reportatio IIB -- B. Reportatio IIA, the Redaction DH, and the Principium secundi -- C. Summary of results -- 2. The text of Reportatio IIA -- V. Summary of the Themes Treated in Reportatio IIA, Questions 1-12 -- Question 1 -- Question 2 -- Questions 3 and 4 -- Questions 5 and 6 -- Questions 7-8-9 -- Question 10 -- Question 11 -- Question 12 -- VI. The Sources of Reportatio IIA, Questions 1-12 -- 1. Explicit sources -- 2. Implicit sources -- VII. Francis' Doctrine of Creation and Historical Impact: A Preliminary Assessment -- VIII. The Edition -- 1. Manuscripts -- 2. Stemma -- Case 1. -- Case 2. -- Case 3. -- Case 4. -- 3. Retention of manuscripts -- 4. Characteristics of individual retained manuscripts -- 5. Editorial method -- IX. Editorial Conventions -- 1. Symbols used in the text -- 2. Symbols used in the apparatus criticus -- 3. Abbreviations used in the apparatus criticus.

4. Abbreviations used in the apparatus fontium and the bibliographies -- 5. Sigla of the manuscripts -- Reportatio A in II Librum Sententiarum, QQ. 1-12 -- Q. 1: Utrum creatio sit demonstrabilis de Deo -- Art. 1: Quid sit creatio -- Rationes in oppositum -- Ad rationes in oppositum -- Art. 2: Utrum creatio-actio sit demonstrabilis de Deo -- Conclusio prima: Forma syllogistica tenet in divinis -- Conclusio secunda: Forma syllogistica tenet in terminis modificatis -- Conclusio tertia: Forma syllogistica tenet in terminis singularibus> -- Conclusio quarta: Forma syllogistica non tenet nisi cum aliqua modificatione> -- Alia argumenta pro secunda conclusione -- Quinque argumenta contra conclusiones positas -- Responsio ad argumenta -- Contra hanc rationem arguitur -- Ad haec argumenta -- Ad alia argumenta -- Rationes in oppositum -- Ad rationes istas -- Q. 2: Utrum creatio sit possibilis subiective et obiective -- Art. 1: Utrum creatio sit possibilis subiective -- Subart. 1: Duo modi dicendi et exclusio eorum -- Unus modus dicendi -- Contra istum modum dicendi -- Secundus modus dicendi> -- Contra secundum modum dicendi -- Subart. 2: Solutio -- Art. 2: Utrum creatio sit possibilis obiective -- Una opinio -- Contra istam opinionem -- Solutio -- Ad rationes in oppositum -- Art. 3: Utrum creatio sit demonstrabilis -- Quoddam dubium et eius impugnatio -- Solutio -- Ad rationes in contrarium -- Q. 3: Utrum omnia alia a primo ente indigeant actuali conservationeab ipso -- Responsio -- Ad argumentum principale -- Q. 4: Utrum creatio et conservatio sint idem realiter -- Responsio -- Art. 1: Quod creatio et actio non distinguuntur extra intellectum -- Art. 2: Aliquae obiectiones excluduntur -- Solutio -- Ad rationes -- Q. 5: Utrum duratio rei differat ab ipsa re durante -- Responsio -- Argumenta in oppositum -- Ad argumenta.

Q. 6: Utrum tempus differat a motu secundum rem -- Responsio -- Argumenta in oppositum -- Ad argumenta -- Q. 7: Utrum creaturae ad Deum sit aliqua relatio realis -- Responsio -- Prima conclusio -- Argumenta in oppositum -- Ad argumenta -- Secunda conclusio -- Ad argumentum principale -- Q. 8: Utrum relatio realis creaturae ad Deum differat realiter a creatura -- Responsio -- Opinio prima -- Opinio secunda -- Ad rationes primae opinionis -- Ad rationes secundae opinionis -- Ad argumentum principale -- Q. 9: Utrum relatio creaturae ad Deum ut ad causam efficientem sit eadem cum relatione creaturae ad ipsum Deum ut ad causam finalem -- Solutio -- Q. 10: Utrum creatura sit immediate producta a Deo per intellectum et voluntatem et per actum intelligendi et volendi -- Responsio -- Art. 1: Utrum angelus moveat immediate caelum per actum intelligendi et volendi -- Rationes in oppositum -- Ad rationes in oppositum -- Art. 2: Utrum angelus moveat immediate per intellectum etvoluntatem -- Rationes in oppositum -- Ad rationes in oppositum -- Art. 3: Utrum Deus immediate agat ad extra per intellectum etvoluntatem -- Quaedam opinio -- Contra istam opinionem -- Solutio -- Art. 4: Utrum Deus immediate agat ad extra per actum intelligendi et volendi, vel per aliquem alium actum -- Unus modus dicendi -- Contra istum modum dicendi -- Solutio -- Ad rationes -- Ad argumentum principale -- Q. 11: Utrum creatio-actio sit in Deo vel in creatura vel in utroque -- Responsio -- Art. 1: Quid sit actio formaliter -- Opinio prima -- Opinio secunda -- Rationes secundae opinionis contra primam opinionem -- Rationes primae opinionis contra secundam opinionem -- Art. 2: In quo sit actio ut in fundamento -- Una opinio -- Contra hanc opinionem -- Solutio -- Ad rationes in oppositum -- Art. 3: In quo sit actio subiective.

Subart. 1: Utrum actio et passio distinguantur a motu ex parte rei vel sint realiter idipsum quod motus -- Subart. 2: Utrum actio sit subiective in agente vel in patiente -- Ad rationes opinionis contrariae -- Art. 4: De creatione-actione et de creatione-passione -- Ad argumenta principalia -- Q. 12: Utrum creatio cuiuscumque rei creabilis fuerit possibilis ab aeterno et utrum fuerit de facto -- Responsio -- Art. 1: Utrum creatio ab aeterno fuerit possibilis -- Subart. 1: Utrum creatio fuerit possibilis ab aeterno quoad entia permanentia -- Prima opinio -- Secunda opinio -- Tertia opinio -- Solutio -- Subart. 2: Utrum creatio ab aeterno fuerit possibilis quoad successiva -- Una opinio -- Rationes speciales pro ista opinione -- Rationes communes pro ista opinione -- Contra istam opinionem -- Ad rationes speciales pro ista opinione -- Ad rationes communes pro ista opinione -- Corollarium de principio 'omne totum est maius sua parte' -- Art. 2: Utrum mundus fuit de facto ab aeterno -- Ad argumenta principalia -- APPENDIX -- Q. 1: Utrum creatio sit demonstrabilis de Deo -- Art. 1: Quid sit creatio-actio -- Rationes in oppositum -- Ad rationes in oppositum -- Art. 2: Utrum creatio-actio sit demonstrabilis de Deo -- Conclusio 1: Forma syllogistica tenet in divinis -- Conclusio 2: Forma syllogistica tenet in terminis modificatis -- Conclusio 3: Forma syllogistica tenet in terminis singularibus -- Quinque argumenta contra conclusiones positas -- Responsio ad argumenta -- Contra hanc rationem arguitur -- Ad haec argumenta -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- Primary Sources -- Secondary Sources -- INDICES -- I. Index Biblicus -- II. Index Auctoritatum -- III. Index Codicum Manuscriptorum -- IV. Index Nominum et Locorum.
Özet:
This commentary exists in two versions:The major version is contained in 17 manuscripts and the critical edition of it is being prepared by a team of specialists led by Prof. Tiziana Suarez-Nani of the University of Fribourg, Switzerland. A minor version is found in one Vatican manuscript and is being edited by Prof. Em. Girard J. Etzkorn. The texts edited in this volume all deal with creation, and investigate such central philosophical and theological issues as action, production, and causality, being and nothingness, the nature of time, God's relation to the world he created, and the distinction between God's creation and God's conservation of the world. Typical of this section of Sentences commentaries is a discussion of the eternity of the world (q. 12), in which Marchia defends the (counterfactual) possibility of the world's eternality as well as the possibility of an actual infinite. Somewhat more unusual for this part of a medieval Sentences commentary is Marchia's highly detailed discussion of the problem of universals and the validity of syllogistic argumentation, all of this part of Marchia's attempt to determine whether creation can be demonstrated about God (q. 1). Throughout these twelve questions, Marchia challenges the ideas of some of the later Middle Ages' best minds, including Peter Auriol, Durand of St. Pourçain, John Duns Scotus, Henry of Ghent, and Giles of Rome.
Notlar:
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2017. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
Elektronik Erişim:
Click to View
Ayırtma: Copies: