Justificatory Liberalism : An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory. için kapak resmi
Justificatory Liberalism : An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory.
Başlık:
Justificatory Liberalism : An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory.
Yazar:
Gaus, Gerald F.
ISBN:
9780195357455
Yazar Ek Girişi:
Fiziksel Tanımlama:
1 online resource (391 pages)
Seri:
Oxford Political Theory
İçerik:
CONTENTS -- ABBREVIATIONS -- 1. INTRODUCTORY: EPISTEMOLOGY AND POLITICAL THEORY -- 1.1. Justificatory Liberalism -- 1.2. Moral Epistemology -- 1.3. Public and Personal Justification -- 1.4. Plan of the Book -- PART I-PERSONAL JUSTIFICATION -- 2. BELIEVING FOR REASONS -- 2.1. Giving, Having, and Believing for Reasons -- 2.2. Reasons as Causes of Beliefs -- 2.3. Sustaining Causes and Justified Belief -- 2.4. Efficient Causation and Justification -- 2.5. Are All Reasons for Beliefs Themselves Beliefs? -- 3. THE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL PERSPECTIVES -- 3.1. Open and Closed Justification -- 3.2. Externalist Justifications -- 3.3. Belief Commitments and Tacit Beliefs -- 3.4. Relativism of Reasons -- 3.5. Relativism and Belief Systems -- 4. TAMING RELATIVISM -- 4.1. Why We Are Not Committed to Normative Cognitive Pluralism -- 4.2. Natural Mental Logic -- 4.3. Mutual Intelligibility and the Limits of Pluralism -- 4.4. Stich's Objection to the Bridgehead -- 4.5. Inferential Errors -- 4.6. Are the Subjects Really Wrong? -- 5. INFERENTIAL JUSTIFICATION -- 5.1. The Argument Thus Far -- 5.2. Four Axioms of Inferential Justification -- 5.3. Defeating Reasons -- 5.4. Epistemic Akrasia -- 6. WHY ALL JUSTIFICATION CANNOT BE PURELY INFERENTIAL -- 6.1. The Regress Argument -- 6.2. Global Coherentism -- 6.3. Inferential Justification and Web Coherentism -- 6.4. Conclusion: Coherence and Inference -- 7. FOUNDATIONALISM AND INTUITIONISM -- 7.1. Coherence Theories and Self-Justified Beliefs -- 7.2. Weak Foundationalism -- 7.3. Moral Intuitionism -- 7.4. Reflective Equilibrium -- 7.5. Summary of Part I -- PART II-PUBLIC JUSTIFICATION -- 8. PRIVATE, SOCIAL, AND PUBLIC REASONERS -- 8.1. Private Reasoners -- 8.2. Social Reasoners and Intersubjective Agreement -- 8.3. Why Reason Publicly? -- 8.4. Moral Demands and Moral Authority -- 8.5. Public Reason and Moral Demands.

9. WHAT IS PUBLIC JUSTIFICATION? -- 9.1. Populist Theories of Public Justification -- 9.2. Openly Justifiable Demands -- 9.3. Defeated and Victorious Justifications -- 9.4. Undefeated Justifications -- 10. LIBERAL PRINCIPLES -- 10.1. Victorious Justification: Constraints and Resources -- 10.2. Toleration, Free Speech, and the Commitment to Public Justification -- 10.3. Immunities as Defeated Proposals -- 10.4. The Public and Private -- 10.5. Why the Reflexivity Requirement Is Misguided -- 11. INCONCLUSIVE PUBLIC REASONING -- 11.1. Two Unacceptable Responses to Inconclusiveness -- 11.2. Liberal Authority -- PART III-POLITICAL JUSTIFICATION -- 12. THE RULE OF LAW -- 12.1. Three Aspects of the Rule of Law -- 12.2. The Internal Morality of Law -- 12.3. Rights -- 12.4. Constitutionalism -- 12.5. Liberal Constitutions and Constitutional Politics -- 13. TRACKING DESIDERATA FOR LAW-MAKING INSTITUTIONS -- 13.1. Law-Making Institutions -- 13.2. The Political Contract -- 13.3. Inconclusiveness, Indeterminacy, and Random Democracy -- 13.4. Widely Responsive Procedures -- 13.5. Deliberative Procedures -- 13.6. Non-Neutral Procedures -- 14. POLITICAL EQUALITY -- 14.1. The Limits of the Consequentialist Justification of Democracy -- 14.2. The Principle of Equality and Political Equality -- 14.3. On Political Inequality -- 15. CHALLENGES TO ADJUDICATIVE DEMOCRACY -- 15.1. The Challenge from Social Choice Theory -- 15.2. The Charge of Public Incompetence -- 15.3. Politics, Self-Interest, and Adjudication -- 15.4. Vote Trading -- 15.5. Adjudication versus Mediation -- 16. THE JUDICIARY AND THE LIMITS OF LEGISLATION -- 16.1. Judges as Umpires -- 16.2. Judicial Review -- 16.3. The Moral Obligation to Obey the Law and Its Limits -- 16.4. Revolution and Utopian Aspirations -- 17. CONCLUSION: JUSTIFICATORY LIBERALISM AND ITS RIVALS.

APPENDIX: LIBERAL PRINCIPLES IN A WORLD OF STATES -- NOTES -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- INDEX -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- Q -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W.
Özet:
This book advances a theory of personal, public and political justification. Drawing on current work in epistemology and cognitive psychology, the work develops a theory of personally justified belief. Building on this account, it advances an account of public justification that is more normative and less "populist" than that of "political liberals." Following the social contract theories of Hobbes, Locke and Kant, the work then argues that citizens have conclusive reason to appoint an umpire to resolve disputes arising from inconclusive public justifications. The rule of law, liberal democracy and limited judicial review are defended as elements of a publicly justified umpiring procedure.
Notlar:
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2017. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
Elektronik Erişim:
Click to View
Ayırtma: Copies: