Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)Veridical Dependency. için kapak resmi
Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)Veridical Dependency.
Başlık:
Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)Veridical Dependency.
Yazar:
Giannakidou, Anastasia.
ISBN:
9789027282286
Yazar Ek Girişi:
Fiziksel Tanımlama:
1 online resource (297 pages)
Seri:
Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today
İçerik:
CONTENTS -- Preface -- 1 The Semantic Nature of Polarity Sensitivity -- 1.1 Previous approaches -- 1.1.1 Affective as negative -- 1.1.2 Affective as downward entailing -- 1.1.3 Problems with downward entailment as the licensing property -- 1.2 Polarity sensitivity as semantic dependency -- 1.2.1 Polarity items as semantically sensitive expressions -- 1.2.2 The representation of sensitivity -- 1.2.3 Licensing and scope -- 1.3 Polarity sensitivity in dynamic semantics -- 1.3.1 The Stalnakerian context -- 1.3.2 Context and information states in update semantics -- 1.3.3 Models of individuals -- 1.3.4 The nonquantificational approach to indefinites -- 1.3.4.1 Tripartite quantification and unselective binding -- 1.3.4.2 Semantic incorporation: minimizers -- 1.4 Conclusion -- 2 Varieties of Sensitivity in Greek -- 2.1 Sentence structure in Greek -- 2.1.1 Word order and verb movement -- 2.1.2 Mood, complementation, and the structure of IP -- 2.2 The syntactic representation of sentential negation -- 2.2.1 Negative particles in Greek -- 2.2.2 The syntactic status of dhe(n) and min -- 2.3 Affective dependencies -- 2.3.1 Two paradigms of affective polarity items -- 2.3.2. Distributional differences -- 2.3.2.1 Grammatical constructions for both paradigms -- 2.3.2.2 Grammatical contexts for nonemphatics -- 2.3.3 Syntactic differences -- 2.3.4 Semantic differences -- 2.3.5 The sensitivity semantics of emphatics and nonemphatics -- 2.3.6 The role of emphatic accent -- 2.4 Free choice items -- 2.4.1 Distribution -- 2.4.2 The semantics of free choice -- 2.4.3 Linking free choice to limited distribution: episodicity -- 2.5 Mood choice in relative clauses -- 2.5.1 Distribution -- 2.5.2 Subjunctive relatives and entailment of existence -- 2. 6 Conclusion: A Typology of Polarity Items in Greek -- 3 Polarity Dependencies and (Non)veridicality.

3.1 Mood choice and affective dependencies -- 3.1.1 Mood choice in Greek -- 3.1.2 Mood choice and nonemphatics -- 3.1.3 (Non)veridicality as an absolute notion -- 3.1.4 Relativized (non)veridicality -- 3.1.5 A licensing condition for affective polarity items -- 3.2 Determiners, quantifiers and (non)veridicality -- 3.2.1 (Non)veridicality of determiners and quantifiers -- 3.2.2 (Non)veridicality of determiners and affective licensing -- 3.3 Other licensing environments for affective polarity items -- 3.3.1 Modal verbs -- 3.3.2 Nondeclaratives: interrogatives, imperatives, exclamatives -- 3.3.3 Conditionals -- 3.3.4 Habituals -- 3.3.5 Future -- 3.3.6 Nonveridicality and the sensitivity semantics of nonemphatics -- 3.4 Negative polarity -- 3.4.1 NPIs as a proper subset of APIs -- 3.4.2 Indirect licensing -- 3.4.2.1 Rhetorical questions and counterfactual conditionals -- 3.4.2.2 Indirect licensing as a secondary option for APIs -- 3.4.2.3 Indirect licensing of APIs -- 3.4.3 A typology of APIs based on nonveridicality -- 3.4.4 Crosslinguistic considerations -- 3.5 Generalizing (non)veridicality: nonaffective dependencies and any -- 3.5.1 Free choice items -- 3.5.2 Subjunctive relatives -- 3.5.3 Any -- 3.6 Conclusion -- 4 The Syntactic Characterization of the Licensing Domain -- 4.1 Manifestations of negative concord -- 4.1.1. A typology of n-words -- 4.1.2 Varieties of negative concord -- 4.2 The NEG-criterion approach -- 4.2.1 N-words as negative quantifiers -- 4.2.2 N-words and wh-phrases -- 4.2.3 Problems with the NEG-criterion -- 4.3 The nonquantificational approach: n-words as indefinites -- 4.3.1 Acquaviva (1993) -- 4.3.2 Two mechanisms for the licensing of n-words: weak and strong licensing -- 4.3.3 Problems with the nonquantificational approach -- 4.4 N-words as context sensitive expressions -- 4.5 Negative concord and quantifier scope.

4.5.1 The compositionality puzzle solved -- 4.5.2 Dependency and scope for polarity items -- 4.5.3 Emphatic movement and wh-movement -- 4.5.3.1 Overt wh-movement and emphatics long-distance -- 4.5.3.2 Emphatics versus Wh-in situ -- 4.5.4 Emphatic licensing and the scope of universal quantifiers -- 4.5.5 Emphatic dependency and focus -- 4.6 Weak negative dependencies -- 4.6.1 In situ licensing of APIs -- 4.6.2 C-command s-structure or LF? -- 4.6.3 'Specificity' effects -- 4.7 The pragmatic import of negative sentences -- 4.7.1 The pragmatics of negative sentences -- 4.7.1.1 Negative dependencies and the theric-categorical distinction -- 4.7.1.2 The Pragmatic Non-Uniformity Hypothesis -- 4.7.2 Overt emphatic preposing as topicalization -- 4.7.2.1 Presence of a clitic -- 4.7.2.2 Unboundedness -- 4.7.2.3 Stacking -- 4.7.2.4 Island sensitivity -- 4.8 Conclusion -- Conclusions -- Bibliography -- Index.
Özet:
Polarity phenomena have been known to linguists since Klima's seminal work on English negation. In this monograph Giannakidou presents a novel theory of polarity which avoids the empirical and conceptual problems of previous approaches by introducing a notion wider than negation and downward entailment: (non)veridicality. The leading idea is that the various polarity phenomena observed in language are manifestations of the dependency of certain expessions, i.e. polarity items, to the (non)veridicality of the context of appearence. Dependencies to negation or downward entailment emerge as subcases of nonveridicality.The (non)veridical dependency may be positive (licensing), or negative (anti-licensing), and arises from the sensitivity semantics of polarity items. The book is also concerned with the syntactic mapping of the sensitivity dependency. It is argued that licensing does not necessarily correspond to a requirement that the licensee be in the scope of the licenser. In some cases, for instance for the interpretation of negative concord, the reverse is required: that the licensee takes the licenser in its scope. The theory is applied to an extended set of old and new data concerning affective, free-choice dependencies, and mood choice in relative clauses. The primary focus is on Greek, but data from Dutch, English, and to a lesser extend Romance and Slavic, are also considered.
Notlar:
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2017. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
Elektronik Erişim:
Click to View
Ayırtma: Copies: