A Transcivilizational Perspective on International Law : Questioning Prevalent Cognitive Frameworks in the Emerging Multi-Polar and Multi-Civilizational World of the Twenty-First Century. için kapak resmi
A Transcivilizational Perspective on International Law : Questioning Prevalent Cognitive Frameworks in the Emerging Multi-Polar and Multi-Civilizational World of the Twenty-First Century.
Başlık:
A Transcivilizational Perspective on International Law : Questioning Prevalent Cognitive Frameworks in the Emerging Multi-Polar and Multi-Civilizational World of the Twenty-First Century.
Yazar:
Yasuaki, Onuma.
ISBN:
9789004249967
Yazar Ek Girişi:
Basım Bilgisi:
1st ed.
Fiziksel Tanımlama:
1 online resource (492 pages)
Seri:
The Pocket Books of the Hague Academy of International Law//Les livres de poche de l'Académie de droit international de La Haye ; v.8

The Pocket Books of the Hague Academy of International Law//Les livres de poche de l'Académie de droit international de La Haye
İçerik:
COPY RIGHT -- HAGUE ACADEMY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW -- FOREWORD -- A Transcivilizational Perspective on International Law -- CONTENTS -- PREFACE -- INTRODUCTION -- CHAPTER I A TRANSCIVILIZATIONAL PERSPECTIVE : A COGNITIVE FRAMEWORK TO UNDERSTAND THE TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY WORLD -- Introduction -- I. From a State-centric and West-centric International Society to a Multi-polar and Multi-civilizational Global Society -- 1. International law in a State-centric and West-centric international society of the twentieth century -- (1) International law and international society -- (2) Characteristic features of the twentieth-century international society -- 2. Conflicts destabilizing the international order -- (1) The conflict between the transnationalization of economics and information, and the sovereign States system -- (2) The conflict between the global quest for human dignity and the sense of victimization shared by non-Western and/or developing nations -- (3) Emerging discrepancies between the economic power and the intellectual/ informational hegemony in global society -- II. Prevalent Perspectives to Understand International Law in the Twentieth Century -- 1. The international perspective -- (1) The predominance of the international perspective -- (2) The persistence of State-centrism -- 2. The transnational perspective -- (1) The emergence of the transnational perspective -- (2) The significance of the transnational perspective -- (3) Problems of international and transnational perspectives -- (4) Participants of international law : various actors with diverse perspectives involved in the international legal process -- III. The Transcivilizational Perspective : A Way to See International Law in a More Nuanced and Comprehensive Manner -- 1. The significance of civilizational factors and perspectives in the sovereign States system.

(1) What is the transcivilizational perspective ? -- (2) Civilizational factors and perspectives as preserved and utilized within the sovereign States system -- (3) Tacit recognition of the significance of civilizational factors and perspectives -- 2. Realities requiring the adoption of the transcivilizational perspective in the twenty-first century -- (1) Significance and decline of the non-intervention principle -- (2) A clash of civilizations ? -- (3) The need to minimize conflicts between egocentric, unilateral universalisms -- (4) The functional notion of the transcivilizational perspective -- (5) Changing the perspective : a crucial task for international lawyers -- CHAPTER II POWER AND LEGITIMACY IN INTERNATIONAL LAW -- Introduction -- I. Law and Power in Global Society -- 1. International law versus the power of States - aprevalent image on law and power in international society -- (1) Complex and multidimensional relations between law, legitimacy and power -- (2) Cases in which international law is actually discoursed and used in a visible manner -- (3) The most frequently asked question : "Can international law control the power of States ?" -- (4) Failure and irrelevance of international law ? -- 2. Might makes right ? -- (1) Power in the creation of international law : a case of bilateral treaties -- (2) Various types of power involved in the creation of multilateral treaties -- (3) The primacy of Western power in the creation of so-called "customary" international law -- (4) The power and legitimacy of the United Nations -- 3. Power that sustains and realizes law -- (1) "Horizontal sanctions" of international law ? -- (2) Can international law be enforced as an adjudicative norm ? -- (3) Collective security, unilateralism and the balance of power in international law -- II. International Law as Power.

1. International law as seen from the perspective of ideational power -- (1) The power of ideas and the power to disseminate the ideas -- (2) The prevalent perception of "irrelevance" of international law -- (3) Unreality of the so-called "realists" view regarding international law as irrelevant -- (4) Societal functions of international law -- 2. The constructive function of international law -- (1) The power of international law to construe and construct social realities -- (2) The power to make ideas of international law become known, disseminated and shared -- III. In Quest of Legitimate Perspectives in the Global Discursive Space -- 1. Problems of West-centrism in international law -- (1) Critiques of West-centrism and their problems -- (2) The need for "intercivilizational" or "transcivilizational"perspectives -- (3) The need for changing the perspective in responding to the multi-polarization of the globe -- (4) Symptoms for change in the study of international law ? -- 2. The power of legitimate international law -- (1) The power of shared normative consciousness in upholding the law -- (2) Significance and problems of international and transnational perspectives -- (3) The transcivilizational perspective : a way to fill the legitimacy deficit in international law -- CHAPTER III TOWARDS A PROPER UNDERSTANDING OF GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW, CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND THE JUDICIARY IN GLOBAL SOCIETY -- Introduction -- I. Concept of General International Law in the Twentieth Century -- 1. Equation of general international law with the so called"customary" international law -- (1) Problems in resorting to Article 38 of the ICJ Statute for identifying the "sources" of international law -- (2) Attitude of the ICJ -- (3) "Absurdity" in relying on Article 38 of the ICJ Statute for identifying norms of international law.

(4) Factors responsible for the over-evaluation of Article 38 of the ICJ Statute -- 2. Liberation of the concept of general international law from the mystical theory of "customary" international law -- (1) The legitimacy deficit of the so-called "customary"international law -- (2) The widening gap between the reality and traditional"customary" international law -- (3) Multinational treaties as a cognitive basis of general international law -- (4) Relative nature of the "universal" validity of general international law -- (5) UNGA resolutions as a cognitive basis of international law -- II. Towards Proper Understandings of the Judiciary in Global Society -- 1. Liberation of the study of international law from excessive judicial-centrism -- (1) Enhanced significance of the judiciary in international society ? -- (2) Aspects not referred to in the prevalent discourseon the "legalization" and "judicialization"in international society -- (3) Necessity for differentiating the significance of the ICJ as an agent of international conflict resolution and the most authoritative organ to interpret international law -- 2. International law in the real world -- (1) Pre-eminence of non-judicial forums where norms of international law are actually referred to, discoursed and used -- (2) Higher values of multinational treaties and UNGA resolutions as cognitive bases of general international law -- (3) The element of power in the creation of general international law -- (4) Towards a more comprehensive perspective for assessing the proper status and functions of international law -- CHAPTER IV HISTORY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AS SEEN FROM A TRANSCIVILIZATIONAL PERSPECTIVE -- Introduction -- I. Problematiques Surrounding the History of International Law -- 1. The problem of projecting a present notion on to the past -- (1) Treaties between States ?.

(2) Problems related to "treaties" during the premodern period -- (3) Problems on the character of the political (or politico-religious) and regional units and the irrelations -- (4) International law as an inter-subjective construct -- 2. Pre-modern worlds without a global international society -- (1) Independent human groups sharing a world image and their relations with other such groups -- (2) A world of co-existing regional civilizations and a world of Eurocentric sovereign States system -- II. The Co-existence of Regional Civilizations in the Pre-Twentieth-Century World -- 1. The Islamic regional civilization and the siyar -- (1) A world composed of dar al-Islam and dar alharb -- (2) Relations with other politico-religious groups as prescribed by the siyar -- 2. The European world and its world images : proselytizing Christianity, secularization of the society and colonization of other regions -- (1) The decentralized structures and Christianity in the European world -- (2) Francisco de Vitoria and Spanish colonization of America : a prototype of European colonization of the world -- (3) International law in its European form -- 3. The Sinocentric tribute system in East Asia -- (1) Sinocentric tribute system -- (2) Diverse perceptions and understandings of Sinocentrism held by various actors -- (3) Deviations within a Sinocentric tribute system -- 4. The conflicts of two universalistic world images in East Asia -- (1) The limited historical applicability of the principle of pacta sunt servanda -- (2) The Macartney mission and the collision of egocentric universalistic world images -- III. The Globalization of a Eurocentric Ordering of the World in the Nineteenth Century -- 1. The collapse of the Islamocentric system of world ordering -- (1) Transformation of the Ottoman Empire to Turkey.

(2) Changing characterization of the Ottoman Empire in the Peace Treaty of Paris of 1856.
Özet:
The twenty-first century will witness conflicts which may destabilize the international order. These conflicts are likely to arise between emerging Asian States such as China and India whose material power is growing, and the Western nations who wield significant ideational power. A West-centric international society will change to a multi-polar and multi-civilizational global society. This structural change includes, and further needs, changes of understandings and perceptions of the world, including of international law. The perspectives from which we see, understand, appreciate and assess international law must change. We need to interpret international law not only from a prevalent Statecentric international perspective and West-centric transnational perspective. Onuma argues that we must grasp international law from what he calls a trans-civilizational perspective as well. By adopting such three-layered perspectives, international law is shown to be functioning as a tool of politics yet constrained by cultural and civilizational factors. Such complex subjects as global history of international law, concepts of general and customary international law, and human rights could be appreciated in a more nuanced and subtle manner.
Notlar:
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2017. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
Elektronik Erişim:
Click to View
Ayırtma: Copies: